Yes, for greater masses the frictional quality of water ingress in joints is greater, and, with the addition of algaeic growth, the friction is reduced further. Imagine small blocks, say an inch square by four inches long. These, made out of the same materials, wouldn't be influenced as much by the gravitational constant as a greater mass would be, and the osmotic effect of water is greater for a lesser mass.
OK dude, I'll take your word on that :-)
Reply | with quote | Posted by Littlestone 20th December 2006ce 22:25 |
Stonehenge lintel holes (Pete G, Dec 20, 2006, 01:56)- Re: Stonehenge lintel holes (wideford, Dec 20, 2006, 09:48)
- Re: Stonehenge lintel holes (nigelswift, Dec 20, 2006, 11:19)
- Re: Stonehenge lintel holes (Littlestone, Dec 20, 2006, 17:17)
- Re: Stonehenge lintel holes (VenerableBottyBurp, Dec 20, 2006, 17:38)
- Re: Stonehenge lintel holes (nigelswift, Dec 20, 2006, 18:27)
- Re: Stonehenge lintel holes (The Eternal, Dec 20, 2006, 22:12)
- Re: Stonehenge lintel holes (Littlestone, Dec 20, 2006, 22:25)
- Re: Stonehenge lintel holes (The Eternal, Dec 20, 2006, 22:20)
|
|