Correction -
"Silbaby is lower than Silbury obviously - but what about Silbury 2? Would the Sanctuary and the top of SILBABY and the top of Silbury 2 all be in a line? Not a two dimentional exact alignment but a three dimensional one....
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
4th December 2006ce
11:09 |
Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 09:56)- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 11:07)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 11:09)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 11:28)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 16:33)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 17:47)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (fitzcoraldo, Dec 04, 2006, 18:12)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 18:21)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 18:59)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 19:11)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 19:26)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 19:27)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 19:43)
- Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 19:49)
- Re: Maps (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 19:56)
- Re: Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 20:03)
- Re: Maps (fitzcoraldo, Dec 04, 2006, 20:48)
- Re: Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 20:57)
- Re: Maps (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 21:30)
- Re: Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 21:33)
- Re: GPS (baza, Dec 04, 2006, 21:53)
- Re: GPS (baza, Dec 04, 2006, 21:59)
- Re: GPS (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 22:15)
- Re: GPS (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 22:22)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (fitzcoraldo, Dec 04, 2006, 11:21)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift)