|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Silbaby Forum | Start a topic | Search |
39 messages | Select a forum: |
| Hi, thanks for that. You mentioned 4 points. Which did you mean? I was only thinking about three - the S-S-S alignment (though as a separate issue, the view of WKLB from Silbaby seems particularly impressive IMO). I'm not "convinced" about it being intentional either. I was just posing a humble question.... does "very accurate" signify a heightened likelihood? ;) In musing about this elsewhere I've come up with a further possible dimension - literally. See this - Silbury from the Sanctuary, with Silbaby hidden by the trees - http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/19965 Silbaby is lower than Silbury obviously - but what about Silbury 2? Would the Sanctuary and the top of Silbury and the top of Silbury 2 all be in a line? Not a two dimentional exact alignment but a three dimensional one.... Aren't the chances it is "chance" reducing dramatically? Reply | with quote |  4th December 2006ce 11:07 In reply to: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan)4 replies: Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift) Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan) Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan) Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan) |
Messages in this topic: |