It's not an entirely subjective evaluation - there are published scientific criteria ( http://www.eng-h.gov.uk/mpp/mcd/cupring.htm ). But what about the 'drilled stones'? If a hole has been made to hold a shaft, such as in one of the 'battle axes', then it's not considered Rock Art. It's an implement. But what if an identical hole has been made in a large boulder ? Maybe the hole was made to take a pole for a banner - is that Rock Art ?
 Reply | with quote | Posted by StoneLifter
2nd October 2006ce
10:12 |
Unusual RA (Hob, Sep 29, 2006, 23:12)- Re: Unusual RA (Rhiannon, Sep 30, 2006, 11:50)
- Re: Unusual RA (whatisthat, Sep 30, 2006, 19:03)
- Re: Unusual RA (Hob, Sep 30, 2006, 21:01)
- Re: Unusual RA (StoneLifter, Oct 01, 2006, 06:56)
- Re: Unusual RA (whatisthat, Oct 01, 2006, 07:17)
- Re: Unusual RA (FourWinds, Oct 01, 2006, 07:23)
- Re: Unusual RA (Rockrich, Oct 01, 2006, 19:04)
- Re: Unusual RA (StoneLifter, Oct 02, 2006, 10:12)
- Re: Unusual RA (The Eternal, Sep 30, 2006, 23:50)
- Re: Unusual RA (Rhiannon, Oct 10, 2006, 18:55)
- Re: Unusual RA (FourWinds, Oct 11, 2006, 06:04)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Unusual RA (Rockrich)