The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   General Discussion Forum Start a topic | Search
The Modern Antiquarian
Re: Sites...but no info
133 messages
Select a forum:
Putting aside whether or not wells merit a mention here (and for what it's worth I think they do) you might be unaware that people using the swastika (in one way or another) have caused considerable offence and disruption on TMA over the last year or so - to the point when they were finally banned. If you want to incorporate that word in your name that's your prerogative, just don't be surprised if you find that it causes offence, negative feelings and possible confusion with others. It may be a sacred symbol but in my humble opinion it is not a sacred word - my advice to you is to change it to one of its variants - FylfotGirl springs to mind.

As for your comment that, "Wells are predominantly female in nature, while most of the contributors here are male and don’t relate to the nature of healing springs." I find that comment both ridiculous and sexist. "Wells are predominately female"? Please explain. And, "...most of the contributors here are male and don’t relate to the nature of healing springs."

Oh dear, I think I must resort to a male-ism - bollocks.


Reply | with quote
Littlestone
Posted by Littlestone
29th September 2006ce
15:19

In reply to:

Re: Sites...but no info (SwastikaGirl)

2 replies:

Re: Sites...but no info (whatisthat)
Re: Sites...but no info (Moth)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page