Jeezus! Well if old Muddy has been banned, based on the venmous diatribe vomited from old Littlestones touchy-touchy fingers, I too must echo thwe word of WhatisThat: "Why doesn't someone ban this asshole?" Littlestone's words are appalling by any standard. He likes to talk - and talk - and pontificate - and talk - endlessly, putting people down and seeing it as funny at times, belittling people. If old Muddy's been banned for simply acting as a mirror to some people occasionally, and simply saying things that most of us would like to say but constantly don't (we'd rather not get involved to be honest - and there are many of us who think this), then Littlestone needs kicking off this site.
If not, why not? And before fellow members of the Rat Pack - as we call them - wanna jump in and throw their words, I wanna hear some sense from the Eds please?
 This topic is locked | Posted by Paulus
13th September 2006ce
10:59 |
John Piper (Jane, Sep 08, 2006, 19:27)- Re: John Piper (FourWinds, Sep 08, 2006, 20:15)
- Re: John Piper (Littlestone, Sep 08, 2006, 20:16)
- Re: John Piper (handofdave, Sep 08, 2006, 21:27)
- Re: John Piper (Mr Hamhead, Sep 10, 2006, 20:37)
- Half-desiccated frogs (Littlestone, Sep 11, 2006, 21:39)
- Re: Half-desiccated frogs (nigelswift, Sep 11, 2006, 22:09)
- Re: Half-desiccated frogs (TMA Ed, Sep 11, 2006, 22:14)
- Re: Half-desiccated frogs (Jane, Sep 12, 2006, 08:16)
- Re: Half-desiccated frogs (Hine, Sep 13, 2006, 10:38)
- Re: John Piper (Grendel, Sep 12, 2006, 07:06)
|
|
Log in |
Register
Head To Head 
Re: Half-desiccated frogs (Hine)