FourWinds wrote: Known physics would rule out most earth energies stuff for a start. Some people don't accept what some scientists claim - they disagree with themselves all the time - so which version of 'known physics' do we take?
Nah. Something like energy fields doesn't have to contradict known physics just coz it ain't understood (assuming it's real, which I'm not sold on). But the fact that we're having this conversation does kinda imply that some people feel there's stuff that is and isn't acceptable on to post on this site, which in itself suggests to me a clique. Who gets to make these decisions? Where are these rules written? Do you see what I mean? It seems as though, by default, a group of regulars is effectively dictating the rules of the forum. Not being shirty about it.... just explaining why it can make people feel a little uncomfortable and excluded.
This topic is locked | Posted by doktoratomik 6th September 2006ce 19:35 |
You are joking sire? (Kammer, Sep 06, 2006, 12:47)- Re: You are joking sire? (CianMcLiam, Sep 06, 2006, 13:01)
- Re: You are joking sire? (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 13:06)
- Re: You are joking sire? (Rhiannon, Sep 06, 2006, 13:30)
- Re: You are joking sire? (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 13:37)
- Re: You are joking sire? (Rhiannon, Sep 06, 2006, 13:53)
- Re: You are joking sire? (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 14:05)
- Re: You are joking sire? (FourWinds, Sep 06, 2006, 14:26)
- Re: You are joking sire? (Kammer, Sep 06, 2006, 14:33)
- Re: You are joking sire? (Rhiannon, Sep 06, 2006, 14:43)
- Re: You are joking sire? (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 14:45)
- Re: You are joking sire? (Rhiannon, Sep 06, 2006, 14:47)
- Re: You are joking sire? (jacksprat, Sep 06, 2006, 15:37)
- Re: You are joking sire? (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 15:40)
- Re: You are joking sire? (Rockrich, Sep 06, 2006, 15:53)
- Re: You are joking sire? (Rhiannon, Sep 06, 2006, 15:54)
- Re: You are joking sire? (Spaceship mark, Sep 06, 2006, 16:06)
- Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (whatisthat, Sep 06, 2006, 18:01)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 18:13)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 18:16)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (FourWinds, Sep 06, 2006, 18:27)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (whatisthat, Sep 06, 2006, 18:38)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 19:13)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (FourWinds, Sep 06, 2006, 19:28)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 19:35)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (FourWinds, Sep 06, 2006, 19:42)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 20:02)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (FourWinds, Sep 06, 2006, 20:10)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (Hob, Sep 06, 2006, 20:32)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (Paulus, Sep 06, 2006, 20:47)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (FourWinds, Sep 06, 2006, 20:51)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (Littlestone, Sep 06, 2006, 21:38)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (Hob, Sep 06, 2006, 21:51)
- Re: Mystical, Academic or Aesthetic (doktoratomik, Sep 06, 2006, 22:22)
- Re: You are joking sire? (whatisthat, Sep 06, 2006, 13:31)
- Re: You are joking sire? (Kammer, Sep 06, 2006, 13:39)
- Time out! (Kammer, Sep 07, 2006, 08:39)
|
|