"Sadly dowsing and telepathy come into this category and have long been shown to be untestable and hence (scientifically) meaningless."
My father works for a firm that uses 'scientific' methods to extract water. Oddly, they have dowsers on the payroll when 'science' fails them.
It amuses me to think that James Randi may indeed have the last laugh as any phenomena replicable under 'scientific' measuring methods would no longer be deemed paranormal or supernatural, and henceforth not eligible for a prize.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by morfe
5th April 2006ce
07:47 |
Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Finally! (jshell, Apr 04, 2006, 17:30)- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Fina (TheBear, Apr 05, 2006, 07:15)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Finally! (Rhiannon, Apr 05, 2006, 07:23)
- Re:you want proof? (cropredy, Apr 05, 2006, 10:13)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Finally! (The Eternal, Apr 05, 2006, 20:19)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Finally! (Hob, Apr 05, 2006, 21:50)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Fina (TheBear, Apr 06, 2006, 07:37)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Finally! (jacksprat, Apr 06, 2006, 11:57)
- Can Lizards dowse? (TheBear, Apr 06, 2006, 16:53)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Finally! (cHARLIE, Apr 06, 2006, 17:15)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Fina (TheBear, Apr 06, 2006, 18:07)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Finally! (Wiggy, Apr 06, 2006, 19:59)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Finally! (BuckyE, Apr 07, 2006, 03:30)
- Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Finally! (Pixxx, Apr 09, 2006, 05:45)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Lets Blow this Dowsing Lark off Fina (TheBear)