No, it's not really a standing stone, (this clasification MAY be because there used to be fewer choices when adding a site). But as Fitz touches on in his blog there seem to be signs and a logic that say boulders like this would have been significant in prehistoric times in a similar way that a lot of outcrops etc are likely to have had.
I'm sure someone'll have a link to do with the (likely/possible) significance & perhaps folklore of 'Thunder Stones' and the like, but I gotta do some work now!!!
love
Moth
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Moth
23rd March 2006ce
10:20 |
Thunder Stone (jacksprat, Mar 23, 2006, 08:42)- Re: Thunder Stone (Moth, Mar 23, 2006, 10:06)
- PS.... (Moth, Mar 23, 2006, 10:20)
- Re: Thunder Stone (rocknicker, Mar 23, 2006, 12:13)
- Re: Thunder Stone (Vicster, Mar 23, 2006, 10:06)
- Re: Thunder Stone (The Eternal, Mar 23, 2006, 23:18)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Thunder Stone (Moth)