Can't we have meaningful boulders though? Agreed it's not a 'standing stone' in that it hasn't been put there deliberately. One imagines. It's not quite as visually arresting as those mushroom-shaped stones (you know the ones).
It could be called a 'natural rock feature' or whatever the category is?
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Rhiannon
1st March 2006ce
13:56 |
Is this really a standing stone? (Kammer, Mar 01, 2006, 13:28)- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Rhiannon, Mar 01, 2006, 13:44)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Vybik Jon, Mar 01, 2006, 13:54)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (wolfnighthunter, Mar 01, 2006, 14:27)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (FourWinds, Mar 01, 2006, 14:43)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (wolfnighthunter, Mar 01, 2006, 14:46)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Kammer, Mar 01, 2006, 14:55)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Moth, Mar 01, 2006, 14:56)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Kammer, Mar 01, 2006, 18:41)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Vybik Jon, Mar 01, 2006, 18:44)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Moth, Mar 01, 2006, 18:52)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (StoneLifter, Mar 01, 2006, 18:53)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (moss, Mar 02, 2006, 07:35)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (StoneLifter, Mar 01, 2006, 18:11)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (jason lives, Mar 01, 2006, 17:40)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Hob, Mar 01, 2006, 17:48)
- Re: Is this really a standing stone? (wideford, Mar 02, 2006, 12:35)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Is this really a standing stone? (Kammer)