For the sake of clarity of understanding I feel I should point out that the "thin scatter" was exactly what all of us to find from a set of trenches positioned so as to be on the very edge of the settlement area.
EH did not design this last excavation to assess the importance of the archaeology - they knew that from the first bit of work. EH wanted to know its extent - which is why they put in such large trenches well away from the core of the settlement.
Tarmac of course have portrayed this as being representative of the site - which is why they were so keen to get people to go round and see there was so little there.
They have also protrayed everybody - EH, NYCC officers and at least one councillor, myself, Dr Jan Harding, the CBA, FoT and no doubt anyone else that values this site as being disonourable.
Reply | with quote | Posted by BrigantesNation 23rd February 2006ce 00:07 |
Setting (BrigantesNation, Feb 21, 2006, 16:09)- Re: Setting (FourWinds, Feb 21, 2006, 17:13)
- Re: Setting (nigelswift, Feb 22, 2006, 07:58)
- Re: Setting (FourWinds, Feb 22, 2006, 08:05)
- Re: Setting (moss, Feb 22, 2006, 08:23)
- Re: Setting (StoneLifter, Feb 22, 2006, 08:36)
- Re: Setting (nigelswift, Feb 22, 2006, 09:06)
- Re: Setting (BrigantesNation, Feb 22, 2006, 10:31)
- Re: Setting (nigelswift, Feb 22, 2006, 11:24)
- Re: Setting (FourWinds, Feb 22, 2006, 15:58)
- Re: Setting (nigelswift, Feb 22, 2006, 17:37)
- Re: Setting (FourWinds, Feb 22, 2006, 20:51)
- Re: Setting (BrigantesNation, Feb 23, 2006, 00:07)
- Re: Setting (BrigantesNation, Feb 22, 2006, 23:58)
- Re: Setting (BrigantesNation, Feb 22, 2006, 23:54)
- Re: Setting (PeterH, Feb 22, 2006, 12:57)
|
|