:-) granted .... 'twas a cheap joke ...... but WHOOSH ....alas ..... no need to duck!!
Anyway, explain this to me .... in all these allignment theories no-one has taken into account that 'things ain't where they used to be'.
Due to platetectonics all these holy sites and misty mountains can be anything from 4km - 8km removed from where they were several millennia ago. Thereby making a modern earthly correlation between them and the stars defunct for that era. With me?
Interested on your thoughts on this.
Reply | with quote | Posted by follow that cow 1st February 2006ce 22:52 |
Anglesey (elderford, Jan 30, 2006, 19:06)- Re: Anglesey (jonG, Feb 01, 2006, 20:10)
- Re: Anglesey (PeterH, Feb 01, 2006, 20:22)
- Re: Anglesey (Jane, Feb 01, 2006, 20:28)
- Re: Anglesey (jonG, Feb 01, 2006, 21:52)
- Re: Anglesey (PeterH, Feb 01, 2006, 22:02)
- Re: Anglesey (jonG, Feb 01, 2006, 22:15)
- Re: Anglesey (Moth, Feb 02, 2006, 00:06)
- Re: Anglesey (Hob, Feb 02, 2006, 00:13)
- Re: Anglesey (FourWinds, Feb 02, 2006, 07:04)
- Re: Anglesey (Kammer, Feb 02, 2006, 14:06)
- Re: Anglesey (Moth, Feb 03, 2006, 00:06)
- Re: Anglesey (ocifant, Feb 03, 2006, 09:21)
- Re: Anglesey (cropredy, Feb 01, 2006, 22:20)
- Re: Anglesey (follow that cow, Feb 01, 2006, 21:47)
- Re: Anglesey (jonG, Feb 01, 2006, 21:58)
- Re:uranus (follow that cow, Feb 01, 2006, 22:52)
- Re: Anglesey (Kammer, Feb 02, 2006, 14:58)
- Re: Sea Kingdoms (follow that cow, Feb 02, 2006, 15:57)
- Re: Anglesey (StoneLifter, Feb 02, 2006, 16:24)
- Re: Anglesey (PeterH, Feb 02, 2006, 16:42)
- Re: Anglesey (cropredy, Feb 02, 2006, 16:47)
- Re: Anglesey (FourWinds, Feb 02, 2006, 18:53)
|
|