There are several possibilities: Pete G "replied" to my post just because it was the last one in line and was being sarcastic. Or, Pete really intended to reply to my post, and was being sarcastic. Or, he was seriously replying to my post, and has a new rule. Because, of course, Pete was immensely gracious a few years back when he met with four unknowns from the Stone Pages--albeit in Jimit's and Nigel's company--and gave them a tour of Avebury. So I'm confused. But, that's not unusual.
Reply | with quote | Posted by BuckyE 15th January 2006ce 17:53 |
Megameet Picnic (Littlestone, Jan 11, 2006, 22:53)- Re: Megameet Picnic (CianMcLiam, Jan 11, 2006, 22:55)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (PeterH, Jan 11, 2006, 22:59)
- Checking my diary (Pete G, Jan 11, 2006, 23:02)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Jane, Jan 11, 2006, 23:18)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Pilgrim, Jan 12, 2006, 00:37)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (David Raven, Jan 12, 2006, 20:11)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (whipangel, Jan 12, 2006, 23:16)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (BuckyE, Jan 14, 2006, 16:39)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Littlestone, Jan 15, 2006, 18:56)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (daveyravey, Jan 15, 2006, 18:59)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Rune, Jan 15, 2006, 23:30)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Pete G, Jan 16, 2006, 01:46)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (jimit, Jan 16, 2006, 08:37)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Jane, Jan 16, 2006, 10:10)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (ocifant, Jan 16, 2006, 12:24)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Seven, Jan 16, 2006, 17:31)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Littlestone, Jan 16, 2006, 17:55)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (cropredy, Jan 16, 2006, 20:58)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (whipangel, Jan 18, 2006, 22:54)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (cropredy, Jan 23, 2006, 19:54)
- Re: Megameet Picnic OT (follow that cow, Jan 28, 2006, 15:44)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Littlestone, Apr 18, 2006, 15:16)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (nigelswift, Jul 29, 2006, 10:55)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Pilgrim, Aug 04, 2006, 22:01)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (jimit, Aug 05, 2006, 07:18)
- Re: Megameet Picnic (Jane, Aug 06, 2006, 18:20)
|
|