Another example of 'rolleyes' research I read on Britarch.
It is part of a agricultural definition, done in depth. Yes and? It can't very well be seen in an archaeological light. We all know that deep ploughs, roots, damage historic remains. ... there has been done enough research on that point. So thats already paid for, could not the money have been better spent?
"It confirmed previous observations made during an evaluation in 2003 that ploughing is damaging the fragile early prehistoric deposits of the area."
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-[...]=1&T=0&F=P&P=40469
Reply | with quote | Posted by Jo-anne 2nd November 2005ce 19:12 |
Excitement at Neolithic site find (Ishmael, Nov 02, 2005, 16:25)- Re: Excitement at Neolithic site find (jimit, Nov 02, 2005, 17:05)
- Re: Excitement at Neolithic site find (rocknicker, Nov 02, 2005, 17:14)
- Re: Excitement at Neolithic site find (Hob, Nov 02, 2005, 17:21)
- Re: Excitement at Neolithic site find (Jo-anne, Nov 02, 2005, 19:12)
|
|