Yeh - no doubt!
And I bet your watertight theory has somewhat less than 600 people involved, am I right?
I'm afraid, Mike, that given the evidence - I think Gordon's more on the right lines here...
I've seen photos and film footage AND taken part in the experiments! I can SHOW you photos and televisual footage! How does that compare to your evidence? Sorry to sound smug, and all that... ;o)
G x
Reply | with quote | Posted by goffik 27th October 2005ce 19:28 |
dead and buried? (tuesday, Oct 24, 2005, 22:19)- Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 24, 2005, 22:45)
- Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 24, 2005, 23:17)
- Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 25, 2005, 09:27)
- Re: dead and buried? (dee, Oct 25, 2005, 14:14)
- Re: dead and buried? (PeterH, Oct 25, 2005, 14:45)
- Re: dead and buried? (tuesday, Oct 25, 2005, 15:07)
- Re: dead and buried? (Kammer, Oct 25, 2005, 16:37)
- Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 26, 2005, 07:44)
- Re: dead and buried? (Rhiannon, Oct 26, 2005, 09:38)
- Re: dead and buried? (Kammer, Oct 26, 2005, 10:21)
- Re: dead and buried? (tuesday, Oct 26, 2005, 11:17)
- Re: dead and buried? (tuesday, Oct 26, 2005, 11:17)
- Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 25, 2005, 17:42)
- Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 26, 2005, 15:43)
- Re: dead and buried? (doktoratomik, Oct 30, 2005, 19:02)
- Re: dead and buried? (nigelswift, Oct 25, 2005, 14:20)
- Re: dead and buried? (smallblueplanet, Oct 25, 2005, 20:01)
- Knackers ... (StoneLifter, Oct 26, 2005, 19:30)
|
|