"costs The Mary Rose Trust £300,000 a year to preserve the timbers of the Mary Rose. The Trust, as an independent charity, is not grant-aided by Government and relies on visitor income and fundraising to sustain its operation."
Just to add some figures to the argument, the upkeep of keeping seahenge timbers wet, must surely be added to the equation - forever? 50 years, 25 years, who pays. I would have liked to have seen them kept as they were....
 Reply | with quote | Posted by moss
21st October 2005ce
09:34 |
Seahenge...... (dee, Oct 20, 2005, 13:00)- Re: Seahenge...... (Kid Calamity, Oct 20, 2005, 13:05)
- Re: Seahenge...... (juamei, Oct 20, 2005, 13:16)
- Re: Seahenge...... (PeterH, Oct 20, 2005, 13:38)
- Re: Seahenge...... (fitzcoraldo, Oct 20, 2005, 14:24)
- Re: Seahenge...... (baza, Oct 20, 2005, 15:27)
- Re: Seahenge...... (BuckyE, Oct 21, 2005, 06:37)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Seahenge...... (nigelswift)