and, coincidentally there is a piece on london's lost' rivers in this week's time out - although it's factually inaccurate with regard to the fleet - you wouldn't get toilet paer and 'brown lumps' now - it's a storm drain for surface water only - nice try though
Reply | with quote | Posted by tuesday 18th August 2005ce 10:06 |
"Sacred" as a prehistoric adjective... (Pilgrim, Aug 07, 2005, 22:04)- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (Littlestone, Aug 07, 2005, 22:30)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (Rune, Aug 07, 2005, 22:34)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (The Eternal, Aug 07, 2005, 22:40)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (nigelswift, Aug 07, 2005, 23:17)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (Kammer, Aug 08, 2005, 00:10)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (FourWinds, Aug 08, 2005, 02:02)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (mike croley, Aug 08, 2005, 18:51)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (Littlestone, Aug 08, 2005, 22:18)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (Rune, Aug 08, 2005, 22:34)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (Pilgrim, Aug 08, 2005, 23:31)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (tuesday, Aug 09, 2005, 00:24)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (nigelswift, Aug 09, 2005, 08:11)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (PeterH, Aug 09, 2005, 15:28)
- lest we forget (morfe, Aug 09, 2005, 18:30)
- Re: "Sacred" as a prehistoric adjec... (tuesday, Aug 16, 2005, 23:57)
|
|