From The Portable Antiquities Scheme website (http://www.finds.org.uk/news/hawkshead.php)
Hawkshead review of the Portable Antiquities Scheme 2004
<i>"Phase 2 of the Portable Antiquities Scheme in 2003-04……………………Around 30,000 finds were recorded: 68% were reported by detectorists and 32% by others"</i>
I presume "others" to include the full range of archaeologists?
<i>"Taking part in 252 finds days attended by over 13,000 people"</i>
and……
<i>"Around 2400 finders reported their finds to the Scheme"</i>
From the report: (http://www.finds.org.uk/documents/PAS_Review_Report_Final.pdf)
"FLOs will have been in regular contact with around 4250 club-based metal detectorists in 2003-04. To place this in context, Treasure Hunting magazine has a circulation of <b>14,000</b> which provides some index to the size of the population of interested public."
Now, for a worse case scenario, what's 14,000 divided by 2,400 and expressed as a ratio?
Pilgrim
X
Reply | with quote | Posted by Pilgrim 2nd August 2005ce 14:24 |
Encouraging responsible metal detecting (Jane, Jul 27, 2005, 22:13)- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (Ishmael, Jul 27, 2005, 22:23)
- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (Pilgrim, Jul 27, 2005, 22:59)
- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (nigelswift, Jul 28, 2005, 02:24)
- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (Cheshireman, Aug 01, 2005, 13:20)
- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (BrigantesNation, Aug 01, 2005, 13:30)
- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (nigelswift, Aug 01, 2005, 13:38)
- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (FourWinds, Aug 01, 2005, 13:39)
- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (juamei, Aug 01, 2005, 14:17)
- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (Pilgrim, Aug 01, 2005, 19:40)
- How about this? (FourWinds, Aug 01, 2005, 18:03)
- Re: Encouraging responsible metal detecting (FourWinds, Aug 03, 2005, 22:29)
|
|