|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Stonehenge and its Environs Forum | Start a topic | Search |
8 messages | Select a forum: |
| Sounds good to me Steve. >another theory is that we have a priesthood from Preseli who have relocated to Salisbury Plain and brought with them some or all their existing place of worship. Don't remember coming across that one Littlestone. My big question (as you may have suggested yourself) would be why would a 'priesthood' move without their population/community/followers? Which kinda means it could still be the same thing. And of course, the stones of the monument they moved with them could still have represented ancestors. Or not - depending if the theory's right!!! love Moth Reply | with quote |  24th June 2005ce 10:49 In reply to: Re: Bluestones = Ancestors (Littlestone) |
Messages in this topic: |
|