|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Stonehenge and its Environs Forum | Start a topic | Search |
219 messages | Select a forum: |
| I thought PT2 was naff when Clive & Mike trashed Gerald Hawkins' and dismissed his findings as a coincidence. They then went on to demonstrate how accurate it was for sunrise/set at solstice and moonstandstill but used a light. They had the chance to film the real thing! In Pt 1 the stonerowing would have been more impressive if they started us rowing at the begining of the day and check every now and then to see how far the stone had travelled. At the end of the day it would have covered an impressive distance. Rowing it back and forward for the camera was a waste of time. Altho the foamhenge had a few of Pitts' nutty ideas (3 slaughter stones standing, blue stone blocking the big trilathon and nowhere for the alter stone....) As Beetlejuice said "Nice fucking model!"  This topic is locked | Posted by Ishmael 23rd June 2005ce 00:44 In reply to: Re: FOAMHENGE (Moth) |
Messages in this topic: |
|