Goff said: I'm sure that's not quite the case though, is it, Tarmac?
If I've got my facts right (what's the chances of that then?), no, it's not. They tried their best to not find anything, by using a 5th of the usual sample size, but even then, evidence was found which could indicate a settlement in the proposed quarry area.
So if it this area gets trashed, bang goes a big part of the available evidence which might shed some light on the purpose of these lovely great monuments.
It's a crying shame that the Aggregates Levy Fund conundrum seems to prevent academics from feeling they can publically decry this quarry application.
Bah! Shift the machinery and get yer gravel elsewhere Tarmac, you stingy, profiteering so-and-sos...
Reply | with quote | Posted by Hob 26th May 2005ce 14:47 |
|