As someone who has disagreed with Pete over some archaeology matters and agreed with him over a vast number of archaeology matters, and knows just how much he cares for Avebury, I think you should keep your offensive remarks to yourself or say what you wish direct to him, not post them here.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
28th February 2005ce
18:34 |
Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (druid, Feb 23, 2005, 21:49)- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (Pete G, Feb 24, 2005, 00:49)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (nigelswift, Feb 28, 2005, 07:52)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (Pete G, Feb 28, 2005, 08:19)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (nigelswift, Feb 28, 2005, 08:42)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (METALHEAD, Feb 28, 2005, 16:03)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (goffik, Feb 28, 2005, 17:14)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (PopeTheoskeptik, Feb 28, 2005, 18:34)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (nigelswift, Feb 28, 2005, 18:34)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (druid, Feb 28, 2005, 19:25)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (doktoratomik, Feb 28, 2005, 20:10)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (Pete G, Feb 28, 2005, 21:09)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (Littlestone, Feb 28, 2005, 22:31)
- Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (Pete G, Feb 28, 2005, 22:35)
- PG Tips (Littlestone, Feb 28, 2005, 23:03)
- Re: PG Tips (doktoratomik, Feb 28, 2005, 23:15)
- Re: PG Tips (Pete G, Feb 28, 2005, 23:16)
- Re: PG Tips (nigelswift, Feb 28, 2005, 23:19)
- Re: PG Tips (FatherOBlivion, Mar 02, 2005, 20:32)
- Hello MEATLHEAD (Pete G, Mar 01, 2005, 02:15)
- Apologies to regulars (@TMA EDs) (Pete G, Mar 01, 2005, 00:06)
- Re: Apologies to regulars (@TMA EDs) (StoneLifter, Mar 01, 2005, 07:24)
- Re: Apologies to regulars (@TMA EDs) (daveyravey, Mar 01, 2005, 09:29)
- ok (Pete G, Mar 01, 2005, 09:51)
- Re: ok (FatherOBlivion, Mar 02, 2005, 20:29)
- Re: Apologies to regulars (@TMA EDs) (Pete G, Mar 01, 2005, 09:50)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Silbury Hill Protest 2005 (METALHEAD)