That'd be great, if permissable. There's a particularly good aerial shot of Pete's, subject to his permission, that would show it's proximity to Silbury really well.
I'll post some brief text emphasising that it's an unknown quantity and included here as an exception, for a reason.
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 23rd November 2004ce 15:05 |
Silbaby -a plea. (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 08:25)- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 08:29)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Jane, Nov 23, 2004, 09:08)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 09:16)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (smallblueplanet, Nov 23, 2004, 09:42)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:02)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:39)
- Silbaby on TMA (TMA Ed, Nov 23, 2004, 11:55)
- Waden hill (Pete G, Nov 23, 2004, 13:37)
- Re: Waden hill (Moth, Nov 23, 2004, 14:46)
- Re: Waden hill (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 15:05)
- Update (Pete G, Nov 23, 2004, 16:35)
- Re: Waden hill? (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 16:16)
- Re: Waden hill (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 15:05)
- Re: Waden hill (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 16:20)
- Re: Silbaby on TMA (Moth, Nov 23, 2004, 14:34)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 16:24)
- Silbaby - a suggestion. (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 17:16)
- More evidence? (ocifant, Nov 23, 2004, 20:55)
- West Kennett enclosures (Rhiannon, Nov 25, 2004, 13:57)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (BrigantesNation, Nov 26, 2004, 15:20)
- Council reply (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 16:09)
- Re WK palisaded enclosures (moss, Nov 28, 2004, 07:32)
|
|