"any sign of a causeway or a spiral path to the top?"
.... Couldn't see one. On the other hand, I thought there was just a hint of the slopes having multiple faces, like Silbury, (Pete and Jim?)but the trees and overgrowth make it very hard to judge. It needs clearing, and some fly tipping removed.
Of course, if it is a proto-Silbury it could be of similar form to one of the earlier Silburys.
Did Pete mention, there's quite a large Sarsen there?
One thing, if you view it from a long way back at the right level and in line with some telephone wires, it's clear that the top is very precisely level.
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 4th May 2004ce 07:02 |
Major discovery by Pete G? (jimit, May 02, 2004, 10:19)- Name that mound! (Pete G, May 02, 2004, 13:57)
- Re: Name that mound! (Pete G, May 02, 2004, 22:04)
- Re: Name that mound! (FourWinds, May 03, 2004, 22:09)
- Re: Name that mound! (nigelswift, May 04, 2004, 12:31)
- Re: Name that mound! (scousemaiden, May 04, 2004, 14:27)
- Re: Major discovery by Pete G? (Tim Bucktoo, May 02, 2004, 20:33)
- Re: Major discovery by Pete G? (wideford, May 02, 2004, 21:00)
- Re: Major discovery by Pete G? (nigelswift, May 02, 2004, 23:36)
- Re: Major discovery by Pete G? (wideford, May 03, 2004, 17:43)
- Re: Major discovery by Pete G? (goffik, May 04, 2004, 06:58)
- Archaeo listing. (Pete G, May 04, 2004, 17:47)
- Finders Keepers (Vybik Jon, Nov 30, 2004, 16:51)
|
|