By all accounts, the view is pretty disappointing. But it would be, since we're always noticing it's level with various places.
This suggests it maybe wasn't aimed to have a dominating view of anywhere, but was kept slightly low deliberately.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
25th April 2004ce
19:25 |
Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Nat, Apr 14, 2004, 09:53)- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Tonight Matthew, Apr 14, 2004, 14:09)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writ (Pete G, Apr 14, 2004, 18:13)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (goffik, Apr 15, 2004, 09:08)
- Silbury. It's a Sign! (Pete G, Apr 15, 2004, 16:36)
- More new Silbury signs! (Pete G, Apr 23, 2004, 17:58)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Littlestone, Apr 23, 2004, 22:02)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Moth)