Nah... still don't buy the size matters argument Baz. Sure it's relevant but not as relevant as, say, it's location or shape. If the Silbury builders really wanted to make a BIG statement they could have built it up on Waden Hill where it would have been visible from a lot further away - instead they chose to build it on one of the lowest points in the Avebury landscape - why? Who knows, but it would seem to indicate that water was probably more important in the overal scheme of things than size.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Littlestone
24th April 2004ce
22:43 |
Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Nat, Apr 14, 2004, 09:53)- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Tonight Matthew, Apr 14, 2004, 14:09)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writ (Pete G, Apr 14, 2004, 18:13)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (goffik, Apr 15, 2004, 09:08)
- Silbury. It's a Sign! (Pete G, Apr 15, 2004, 16:36)
- More new Silbury signs! (Pete G, Apr 23, 2004, 17:58)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Littlestone, Apr 23, 2004, 22:02)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (FourWinds, Apr 23, 2004, 22:28)
- It's a troll! It's a troll! (Ishmael, Apr 24, 2004, 13:53)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (baza, Apr 24, 2004, 17:51)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Littlestone, Apr 24, 2004, 22:43)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (baza)