But the report on the archaeology by David Field (I think it was that one) scoured the world and proved Sil was the biggy. Not that it matters as stability matters as much as size they say.
Now that we've got the signs up, I wonder if the fence is to follow? And is there any suggestion of controlling the rabbits?
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 23rd April 2004ce 19:12 |
Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Nat, Apr 14, 2004, 09:53)- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Tonight Matthew, Apr 14, 2004, 14:09)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writ (Pete G, Apr 14, 2004, 18:13)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (goffik, Apr 15, 2004, 09:08)
- Silbury. It's a Sign! (Pete G, Apr 15, 2004, 16:36)
- More new Silbury signs! (Pete G, Apr 23, 2004, 17:58)
- Re: Silbury Hill - Dr Brown from EH writes (Littlestone, Apr 23, 2004, 22:02)
|
|