There seem to be a lot of websites promoting the Orion alignment of the pyramids as a definite , whereas the extablishment now dismisses the idea. The argument seems to be stuck in the same situation as Thornborough - how persuasive is the level of accuracy?
I read that the Beebs Horizon programme said a 9 degree error at Giza "proved" it wasn't deliberate. I've re-done it more carefully and it seems Thornboro is more accurate than that. http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/25391
So now what? If Giza is real, Thornborough is more competent. If Giza isn't real, Thornborough might still be.
(This might be a good selling point for Thornborough George - "represents Orion to a level of accuracy that puts the Ancient Egyptians to shame" !)
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 13th March 2004ce 08:45 |
Yorkshire shows the Egyptians how to do it! (nigelswift, Mar 13, 2004, 08:45) |
|