As the comments on the site on TMA already said, it has been flattened somewhat. It is almost without interpretation (but I think that can be over-rated with these sites since we know so little about them). I'm no authority on the management. I assume that all those trees must have messed up the possibilities for archaeology somewhat (but then archaeology is so destructive!!!!). It seems well managed to me. Held with a light hand - not too many "do not" signs and it is locally popular and well visited. (and is part of the core business of NT, unlike John Lennon's old home!!!!!)
 Reply | with quote | Posted by madelaine
21st January 2004ce
12:51 |
Photos (madelaine, Jan 20, 2004, 13:06)- Re: Photos (jimit, Jan 20, 2004, 13:18)
- Badbury Hill Camp (pure joy, Jan 21, 2004, 10:11)
- Re: Badbury Hill Camp (madelaine, Jan 21, 2004, 12:51)
|
|
Head To Head 
Badbury Hill Camp (pure joy)