The completely stupid thing is that it's mostly the image that's of value to the advertiser so I'm sure NT could make just as much by licensing them to use just an image with some digital alterations. Same disrespect but no tramping all over sites.
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 21st January 2004ce 08:02 |
More Brandalism! (Pete G, Jan 13, 2004, 17:56)- Re: More Brandalism! (nigelswift, Jan 13, 2004, 19:00)
- Re: More Brandalism! (Visitor, Jan 13, 2004, 22:05)
- Re: More Brandalism! (third degree, Jan 13, 2004, 23:29)
- Re: More Brandalism! (Pete G, Jan 16, 2004, 16:39)
- Latest BBC report (Pete G, Jan 16, 2004, 19:12)
- Re: More Brandalism! (pure joy, Jan 18, 2004, 20:30)
- Re: More Brandalism! (RiotGibbon, Jan 20, 2004, 17:06)
|
|