Forums | Re: why buried? – The Modern Antiquarian.com

The Modern Antiquarian

Home	Latest Posts	Forums	Maps	Help

Browse Sites	News	Blog	Contributors	The Books

Head To Head

The Modern Antiquarian

Avebury Forum

Start a topic | Search

Avebury

Re: why buried?

103 messages

Select a forum:

>The Barber surgeon story has been re-written after Mike Pitts rediscovered the >skeleton in London. He only had a small crack on his left hip indicating that he was >rolled into the pit After the stone was toppled. If he was buried underneath a stone >his bones would have been smashed.

Do you have a link for the story at all Pete if it's on the web?... I'd be interested in reading about it. I saw a pic in a book (Stonehenge Complete????) of a skull under a stone, and yes, it looked remarkably unsmashed for someone with 'X' tons of rock dropped on them!

Reply | with quote

Posted by Kozmik_Ken
4th December 2003ce
15:45

(Rhiannon, Dec 02, 2003, 17:52)

Re: new stones found (Pete G, Dec 02, 2003, 20:23)
from today's Independent (grrr, Dec 03, 2003, 11:47)
- Re: from today's Independent (pebblesfromheaven, Dec 03, 2003, 11:49)
  - Re: from today's Independent (suave harv, Dec 03, 2003, 13:54)
    - Re: from today's Independent (suave harv, Dec 03, 2003, 13:55)
      - Re: from today's Independent (Pete G, Dec 03, 2003, 13:59)
        Re: from today's Independent (suave harv, Dec 03, 2003, 15:10)
        Re: from today's Independent (Pete G, Dec 03, 2003, 15:24)
        Re: from today's Independent (suave harv, Dec 03, 2003, 15:40)
        Re: from today's Independent (nigelswift, Dec 03, 2003, 16:48)
        Re: from today's Independent (Pete G, Dec 03, 2003, 16:55)
        Re: from today's Independent [sos] (megalith6, Jun 26, 2004, 10:31)
BBC article (Killer, Dec 03, 2003, 14:07)
BBC article (Killer, Dec 03, 2003, 14:07)
Re: new stones found (Kammer, Dec 03, 2003, 14:10)
- Re: new stones found (Rhiannon, Dec 03, 2003, 17:04)
  - Re: new stones found (Pete G, Dec 03, 2003, 17:11)
    - Re: new stones found (GordonP, Dec 03, 2003, 17:22)
      - Re: new stones found (Pete G, Dec 03, 2003, 17:27)
        Re: new stones found (Vybik Jon, Dec 03, 2003, 18:03)
    - Re: new stones found (Kammer, Dec 04, 2003, 13:29)
      - Re: new stones found (Steve Gray, Dec 04, 2003, 14:39)
        Dildonics (FourWinds, Dec 04, 2003, 14:45)
      - Quake (Pete G, Dec 04, 2003, 15:33)
        Re: Quake (Kammer, Dec 05, 2003, 09:25)
        Re: Quake (Chris Collyer, Dec 05, 2003, 09:41)
        Re: Quake (Steve Gray, Dec 05, 2003, 11:56)
        Re: Quake (Pete G, Dec 05, 2003, 12:17)
Its the Pitts (Pete G, Dec 03, 2003, 18:47)
- Re: Its the Pitts (baza, Dec 03, 2003, 18:54)
  - Re: Its the Pitts (suave harv, Dec 03, 2003, 18:59)
    - Re: Its the Pitts (nigelswift, Dec 03, 2003, 19:10)
      - Re: Its the Pitts (baza, Dec 03, 2003, 19:31)
        Re: Its the Pitts (nigelswift, Dec 03, 2003, 20:29)
      - Re: Its the Pitts (Pete G, Dec 03, 2003, 23:24)
        Re: Its the Pitts (neighbourofthedrude, Dec 04, 2003, 14:41)
        Re: Its the Pitts (Pete G, Dec 04, 2003, 15:29)
Re: new stones found (gm, Dec 03, 2003, 19:47)
- Re: new stones found (Moth, Dec 03, 2003, 20:40)
  - Re: new stones found (pebblesfromheaven, Dec 03, 2003, 22:33)
    - New 'low profile' Moth (Moth, Dec 04, 2003, 01:47)
      - Re: New 'low profile' Moth (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2003, 09:09)
        Re: New 'low profile' Moth (BlueGloves, Dec 04, 2003, 09:24)
        Re: New 'low profile' Moth (FourWinds, Dec 04, 2003, 10:14)
        Re: New 'low profile' Moth (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2003, 10:31)
        Re: New 'low profile' Moth (Rhiannon, Dec 04, 2003, 10:53)
        Re: New 'low profile' Moth (FourWinds, Dec 04, 2003, 11:03)
        Re: New 'low profile' Moth (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2003, 11:25)
        why buried? (Joanna, Dec 04, 2003, 12:16)
        Re: why buried? (FourWinds, Dec 04, 2003, 12:22)
        Re: why buried? (Rhiannon, Dec 04, 2003, 12:25)
        Re: why buried? (Pete G, Dec 04, 2003, 12:24)
        Re: why buried? (Rhiannon, Dec 04, 2003, 12:29)
        Re: why buried? (Pete G, Dec 04, 2003, 12:34)
        Re: why buried? (Rhiannon, Dec 04, 2003, 12:39)
        Re: why buried? (FourWinds, Dec 04, 2003, 13:14)
        Re: why buried? (Pete G, Dec 04, 2003, 13:19)
        Re: why buried? (FourWinds, Dec 04, 2003, 13:30)
        Re: why buried? (Pete G, Dec 04, 2003, 13:40)
        Re: why buried? (Kozmik_Ken, Dec 04, 2003, 14:28)
        Re: why buried? (Pete G, Dec 04, 2003, 15:27)
        Re: why buried? (Kozmik_Ken, Dec 04, 2003, 15:45)
        Re: why buried? (Joanna, Dec 04, 2003, 15:46)
        Re: why buried? (Pete G, Dec 04, 2003, 15:50)
        Oops (Pete G, Dec 04, 2003, 15:57)
        Re: why buried? (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2003, 13:42)
        Re: why buried? (megalith6, Jun 21, 2004, 00:03)
        Re: New 'low profile' Moth (Rhiannon, Dec 04, 2003, 12:21)
        Re: New 'low profile' Moth (BlueGloves, Dec 04, 2003, 12:40)
        Re: putting them back up (Rhiannon, Dec 04, 2003, 12:50)
        Re: putting them back up (suave harv, Dec 04, 2003, 16:55)
        Re: putting them back up (GordonP, Dec 04, 2003, 17:54)
        Re: putting them back up (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2003, 18:40)
        What - like this ? (BlueGloves, Dec 05, 2003, 08:01)
        Re: putting them back up (BlueGloves, Dec 05, 2003, 07:55)
        Re: putting them back up (nigelswift, Dec 05, 2003, 08:36)
        Re: putting them back up (FourWinds, Dec 05, 2003, 08:43)
        Re: putting them back up (nigelswift, Dec 05, 2003, 08:57)
        Also... (nigelswift, Dec 05, 2003, 09:06)
        And (BlueGloves, Dec 06, 2003, 10:17)
        Re: And (nigelswift, Dec 06, 2003, 11:32)
        Re: And (BlueGloves, Dec 06, 2003, 13:33)
        Re: putting them back up (megalith6, Jun 20, 2004, 23:45)
        Re: putting them back up (FourWinds, Jun 21, 2004, 07:16)
        Re: putting them back up (FourWinds, Jun 21, 2004, 07:31)
        Re: putting them back up (megalith6, Jun 26, 2004, 00:32)
        Re: putting them back up (nigelswift, Jun 21, 2004, 08:07)
        Re: putting them back up (rocknicker, Jun 21, 2004, 09:19)
        Re: putting them back up (doktoratomik, Jun 21, 2004, 12:00)
        Re: putting them back up (nigelswift, Jun 21, 2004, 13:10)
        Re: putting them back up (VenerableBottyBurp, Jun 21, 2004, 14:11)
        Re: putting them back up (VenerableBottyBurp, Jun 21, 2004, 14:12)
        Re: putting them back up (nigelswift, Jun 21, 2004, 15:13)
        Re: putting them back up (StoneLifter, Jun 21, 2004, 21:52)
        Re: putting them back up (megalith6, Jul 01, 2004, 23:14)
        Re: putting them back up (megalith6, Jul 01, 2004, 23:13)
        Re: putting them back up (nigelswift, Jul 02, 2004, 05:35)
        Re: putting them back up (Pete G, Jul 02, 2004, 12:14)
        Re: putting them back up (megalith6, Jun 26, 2004, 00:08)
        Re: putting them back up (megalith6, Jul 04, 2004, 01:56)
        Re: putting them back up (nigelswift, Jul 04, 2004, 06:51)
        Re: putting them back up (Littlestone, Jul 04, 2004, 22:23)

Terms & Conditions | Home | Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Top of page

The Modern Antiquarian

In reply to:

2 replies:

Messages in this topic: