Skanska have spent a long and expensive time investigating. They've long gone. The report (surely) wouldn't contain anything Skanska regarded as confidential to them and the data (surely) belongs to the client, not them.
And yet, despite EH's previous public assurances to the contrary, the report hasn't been released. I've heard it suggested that ANOTHER investigation is needed and that the Skanska results were insufficient. It's pretty new technology, licensed from America so who knows if it was fully appropriate for this purpose.
Unkind people might fantasize that EH were embarrassed that they'd spent time and oodles of public money getting nowhere. That's the sort of unwarranted speculation that takes root in an atmosphere of secrecy so it would be better if things were out in the open.
This topic is locked | Posted by nigelswift 13th November 2003ce 16:30 |
Serious Conservation 2 (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:04)- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (TomBo, Nov 06, 2003, 16:06)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 16:39)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:43)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 16:43)
- HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 17:03)
- Heritage Action (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 18:14)
- Ha ! (BlueGloves, Nov 06, 2003, 18:43)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 20:29)
- Re: A is for... (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 20:37)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 20:41)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 20:50)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 21:41)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 22:00)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 23:02)
- Re: HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 20:57)
- Re: HA! (baza, Nov 06, 2003, 21:06)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 21:08)
- Re: HA! (baza, Nov 06, 2003, 21:14)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 21:15)
- Re: HA! (Steve Gray, Nov 07, 2003, 00:10)
- Re: HA! (baza, Nov 07, 2003, 00:47)
- Re: HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 21:09)
- A Ha (AtomicMutton, Nov 06, 2003, 21:22)
- Re: A Ha (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 21:25)
- Re: A Ha (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 21:33)
- Re: A Ha (Steve Gray, Nov 07, 2003, 00:20)
- Re: A Ha (AtomicMutton, Nov 07, 2003, 09:53)
- Re: HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 21:19)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 21:29)
- Right, ya buggers!!! (Moth, Nov 07, 2003, 02:23)
- In Praise of Indecision (nigelswift, Nov 07, 2003, 02:48)
- Ritual Ruination Rumblers (BrigantesNation, Nov 07, 2003, 07:15)
- What, precisely, are we talking about? (nigelswift, Nov 07, 2003, 08:03)
- Another fourpenn'orth! (jimit, Nov 07, 2003, 13:49)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Earthstepper, Nov 12, 2003, 18:14)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Earthstepper, Nov 12, 2003, 18:15)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (morfe, Nov 12, 2003, 18:36)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (BrigantesNation, Nov 12, 2003, 19:13)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Jane, Nov 12, 2003, 19:23)
- hang on a mo (FourWinds, Nov 12, 2003, 19:28)
- Parishes against gravel extraction (Jane, Nov 12, 2003, 19:35)
- Re: Parishes against gravel extraction (FourWinds, Nov 12, 2003, 20:04)
- Nimbys and names (Earthstepper, Nov 12, 2003, 20:18)
- Re: Nimbys and names (BrigantesNation, Nov 12, 2003, 21:02)
- Perhaps it's just me...? (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 00:40)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 03:24)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 07:24)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (FourWinds, Nov 13, 2003, 07:46)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 09:03)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 09:15)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Jane, Nov 13, 2003, 09:20)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 10:29)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 10:38)
- Let's just go for this: (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 10:39)
- Re: Let's just go for this: (Steve Gray, Nov 13, 2003, 11:13)
- Re: Let's just go for this: (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 11:15)
- Re: Let's just go for this: (Steve Gray, Nov 13, 2003, 11:22)
- Heritage Action Logo (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 13, 2003, 11:37)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Jane, Nov 13, 2003, 12:30)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Steve Gray, Nov 13, 2003, 12:51)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 13, 2003, 13:10)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Jane, Nov 13, 2003, 13:19)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 13:23)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 13:27)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 13, 2003, 13:47)
- Late starter (Martin, Nov 13, 2003, 14:28)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 14:47)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Hob, Nov 13, 2003, 13:25)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 11:14)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 11:06)
- Hi ES (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 10:36)
- Re: hang on a mo (BrigantesNation, Nov 12, 2003, 20:42)
|
|