"I still think that there is merit in individuals keeping watch on their patch - much as Blue Gloves does. Then the "group" could give appropriate assistance and support when needed."
Totally agree with that.
In fact I agree that we're essentially agreed, as it's essential we are.
I had a thought, if we do go for Silbury, a Thornborough style online petition would be a good thing to run, eg. something along the lines...
Silbury Hill, a World Heritage monument, Europe's largest Stone Age mound and one of Britain's most
treasured places suffered a major collapse in May 2000 and further ones since then.
We, the undersigned, demand that it's statutorily appointed guardians, English Heritage, break their silence about the reasons for the delay and share with the public what is known and what is planned.
In particular:
WHY so long?
What were the findings of the latest surveys?
Is further collapse possible?
Are further surveys needed?
Are the temporary measures effective?
What is now planned?
How much longer before a solution is achieved?
And why and by what right is a concerned worldwide public being kept totally in the dark about this precious part
of our shared heritage?
This topic is locked | Posted by nigelswift 13th November 2003ce 09:15 |
Serious Conservation 2 (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:04)- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (TomBo, Nov 06, 2003, 16:06)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 16:39)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:43)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 16:43)
- HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 17:03)
- Heritage Action (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 18:14)
- Ha ! (BlueGloves, Nov 06, 2003, 18:43)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 20:29)
- Re: A is for... (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 20:37)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 20:41)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 20:50)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 21:41)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 22:00)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 23:02)
- Re: HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 20:57)
- Re: HA! (baza, Nov 06, 2003, 21:06)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 21:08)
- Re: HA! (baza, Nov 06, 2003, 21:14)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 21:15)
- Re: HA! (Steve Gray, Nov 07, 2003, 00:10)
- Re: HA! (baza, Nov 07, 2003, 00:47)
- Re: HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 21:09)
- A Ha (AtomicMutton, Nov 06, 2003, 21:22)
- Re: A Ha (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 21:25)
- Re: A Ha (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 21:33)
- Re: A Ha (Steve Gray, Nov 07, 2003, 00:20)
- Re: A Ha (AtomicMutton, Nov 07, 2003, 09:53)
- Re: HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 21:19)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 21:29)
- Right, ya buggers!!! (Moth, Nov 07, 2003, 02:23)
- In Praise of Indecision (nigelswift, Nov 07, 2003, 02:48)
- Ritual Ruination Rumblers (BrigantesNation, Nov 07, 2003, 07:15)
- What, precisely, are we talking about? (nigelswift, Nov 07, 2003, 08:03)
- Another fourpenn'orth! (jimit, Nov 07, 2003, 13:49)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Earthstepper, Nov 12, 2003, 18:14)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Earthstepper, Nov 12, 2003, 18:15)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (morfe, Nov 12, 2003, 18:36)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (BrigantesNation, Nov 12, 2003, 19:13)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Jane, Nov 12, 2003, 19:23)
- hang on a mo (FourWinds, Nov 12, 2003, 19:28)
- Parishes against gravel extraction (Jane, Nov 12, 2003, 19:35)
- Re: Parishes against gravel extraction (FourWinds, Nov 12, 2003, 20:04)
- Nimbys and names (Earthstepper, Nov 12, 2003, 20:18)
- Re: Nimbys and names (BrigantesNation, Nov 12, 2003, 21:02)
- Perhaps it's just me...? (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 00:40)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 03:24)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 07:24)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (FourWinds, Nov 13, 2003, 07:46)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 09:03)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 09:15)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Jane, Nov 13, 2003, 09:20)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 10:29)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 10:38)
- Let's just go for this: (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 10:39)
- Re: Let's just go for this: (Steve Gray, Nov 13, 2003, 11:13)
- Re: Let's just go for this: (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 11:15)
- Re: Let's just go for this: (Steve Gray, Nov 13, 2003, 11:22)
- Heritage Action Logo (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 13, 2003, 11:37)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Jane, Nov 13, 2003, 12:30)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Steve Gray, Nov 13, 2003, 12:51)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 13, 2003, 13:10)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Jane, Nov 13, 2003, 13:19)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 13:23)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 13:27)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 13, 2003, 13:47)
- Late starter (Martin, Nov 13, 2003, 14:28)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 14:47)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Hob, Nov 13, 2003, 13:25)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 11:14)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 11:06)
- Hi ES (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 10:36)
- Re: hang on a mo (BrigantesNation, Nov 12, 2003, 20:42)
|
|