I would say any campaign, no matter how apparently small, is a very significant endeavour. I chose Thornborough believe it or not, because it is an easy one. The smaller the site the bigger the problem. Avebury, on the face of it is an easy one, but don't think that by having a letterhead you will have any greater impact that you would alone. The group, whatever it looks like, must have teeth.
Teeth come in various forms, be they causing intense embarassment by showing a well documented inconsistent or tardy approach, or they can come in the form of the threat of intense media attention. Either way these things take planning. Often, the letter writing approach, in terms of digging for the embarasing information can take years.
I suggest that Heritage Action, takes action! Instead of talking why not do some doing. Set up a website identifying the issues at Silbury and start gathering information. Set up an online petition and start getting a few signatures - the more people sign the better you perceived support will be. Set up a public event at Silbury and invite the media (A nice rally from Avebury to Silbury would sort it) - but make sure it's legal and well attended, let the authorities know what you are doing and Heritage Action will begin to form into a cohesive thing. After the event at Avebury, hold a public meeting where opinion can be sought about what Heritage Action should be fighting for. You may well need a mdia event prior to this. A headline of "Silbury Hill is collapsing" might do it.
Just an idea.
This topic is locked | Posted by BrigantesNation 7th November 2003ce 16:08 |
Serious Conservation 2 (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:04)- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (TomBo, Nov 06, 2003, 16:06)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 16:39)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:43)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 16:43)
- HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 17:03)
- Heritage Action (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 18:14)
- Ha ! (BlueGloves, Nov 06, 2003, 18:43)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 20:29)
- Re: A is for... (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 20:37)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 20:41)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 20:50)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 21:41)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 22:00)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 23:02)
- Re: HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 20:57)
- Re: HA! (baza, Nov 06, 2003, 21:06)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 21:08)
- Re: HA! (baza, Nov 06, 2003, 21:14)
- Re: HA! (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 21:15)
- Re: HA! (Steve Gray, Nov 07, 2003, 00:10)
- Re: HA! (baza, Nov 07, 2003, 00:47)
- Re: HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 21:09)
- A Ha (AtomicMutton, Nov 06, 2003, 21:22)
- Re: A Ha (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 21:25)
- Re: A Ha (Jane, Nov 06, 2003, 21:33)
- Re: A Ha (Steve Gray, Nov 07, 2003, 00:20)
- Re: A Ha (AtomicMutton, Nov 07, 2003, 09:53)
- Re: HA! (Hob, Nov 06, 2003, 21:19)
- Re: HA! (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 21:29)
- Right, ya buggers!!! (Moth, Nov 07, 2003, 02:23)
- In Praise of Indecision (nigelswift, Nov 07, 2003, 02:48)
- Ritual Ruination Rumblers (BrigantesNation, Nov 07, 2003, 07:15)
- What, precisely, are we talking about? (nigelswift, Nov 07, 2003, 08:03)
- Re: What, precisely, are we talking about? (Earthstepper, Nov 07, 2003, 09:07)
- Re: What, precisely, are we talking about? (nigelswift, Nov 07, 2003, 09:26)
- Re: What, precisely, are we talking about? (Earthstepper, Nov 07, 2003, 10:49)
- Re: What, precisely, are we talking about? (BrigantesNation, Nov 07, 2003, 16:08)
- Another fourpenn'orth! (jimit, Nov 07, 2003, 13:49)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Earthstepper, Nov 12, 2003, 18:14)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Earthstepper, Nov 12, 2003, 18:15)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (morfe, Nov 12, 2003, 18:36)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (BrigantesNation, Nov 12, 2003, 19:13)
- Re: Serious Conservation 2 (Jane, Nov 12, 2003, 19:23)
- hang on a mo (FourWinds, Nov 12, 2003, 19:28)
- Parishes against gravel extraction (Jane, Nov 12, 2003, 19:35)
- Re: Parishes against gravel extraction (FourWinds, Nov 12, 2003, 20:04)
- Nimbys and names (Earthstepper, Nov 12, 2003, 20:18)
- Re: Nimbys and names (BrigantesNation, Nov 12, 2003, 21:02)
- Perhaps it's just me...? (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 00:40)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 03:24)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 07:24)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (FourWinds, Nov 13, 2003, 07:46)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 09:03)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 09:15)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Jane, Nov 13, 2003, 09:20)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 10:29)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 10:38)
- Let's just go for this: (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 10:39)
- Re: Let's just go for this: (Steve Gray, Nov 13, 2003, 11:13)
- Re: Let's just go for this: (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 11:15)
- Re: Let's just go for this: (Steve Gray, Nov 13, 2003, 11:22)
- Heritage Action Logo (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 13, 2003, 11:37)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Jane, Nov 13, 2003, 12:30)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Steve Gray, Nov 13, 2003, 12:51)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 13, 2003, 13:10)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Jane, Nov 13, 2003, 13:19)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 13:23)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 13:27)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 13, 2003, 13:47)
- Late starter (Martin, Nov 13, 2003, 14:28)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 14:47)
- Re: Heritage Action Logo (Hob, Nov 13, 2003, 13:25)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (Earthstepper, Nov 13, 2003, 11:14)
- Re: Perhaps it's just me...? (nigelswift, Nov 13, 2003, 11:06)
- Hi ES (Moth, Nov 13, 2003, 10:36)
- Re: hang on a mo (BrigantesNation, Nov 12, 2003, 20:42)
|
|