"Offerings can be made to a place"
Okay, I can understand that and there's no human form involved, no personification. But I don't see much evidence for that being what happened in the past - all cultures personify, it is a basic part of being human.
"You can leave offerings for the pixies that look after a spring or the nymphs that live in it."
This is where my confusion creeps in - pixies and nymphs are human forms, personifications. And if you're leaving offerings to the pixies/nymphs then you're treating them as god(esse)s, to all intents and purposes. That's the crux of my argument (I think!) - that the pixies/nymphs were to their time what the gods were to later times.
"One day one of these 'spirits' gets a name as top-nymph and becomes a god(dess)."
That seems to me a monotheistic way of thought that would hold true only for the process whereby pantheons become monotheisms. Prehistoric people were animists/pantheists. There was no one god/goddess on top of the heap. All were important.
Reply | with quote | Posted by TomBo 24th September 2003ce 14:56 |
Tombo's weblogs... (nigelswift, Sep 22, 2003, 10:01)- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Holy McGrail, Sep 22, 2003, 10:17)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Hob, Sep 22, 2003, 14:08)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Jane, Sep 22, 2003, 21:16)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (FourWinds, Sep 22, 2003, 21:33)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Jane, Sep 22, 2003, 21:50)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Earthstepper, Sep 22, 2003, 22:18)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Steve Gray, Sep 23, 2003, 00:18)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (FourWinds, Sep 23, 2003, 07:24)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (nigelswift, Sep 23, 2003, 08:48)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (FourWinds, Sep 23, 2003, 09:12)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (nigelswift, Sep 23, 2003, 09:25)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Jane, Sep 23, 2003, 09:29)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (nigelswift, Sep 23, 2003, 09:35)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Jane, Sep 23, 2003, 09:46)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (nigelswift, Sep 23, 2003, 09:52)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Jane, Sep 23, 2003, 09:56)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (nigelswift, Sep 23, 2003, 10:08)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Jane, Sep 23, 2003, 10:11)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (nigelswift, Sep 23, 2003, 10:17)
- Re: Radiating Power (treaclechops, Sep 23, 2003, 10:36)
- Re: Radiating Power (Earthstepper, Sep 23, 2003, 10:48)
- Just because it's pretty? (FourWinds, Sep 23, 2003, 10:56)
- splitting hairs? (TomBo, Sep 24, 2003, 01:43)
- Re: splitting hairs? (FourWinds, Sep 24, 2003, 06:51)
- you don't have to! (TomBo, Sep 24, 2003, 13:43)
- Re: you don't have to! (FourWinds, Sep 24, 2003, 14:39)
- Re: you don't have to! (TomBo, Sep 24, 2003, 14:56)
- Re: you don't have to! (FourWinds, Sep 24, 2003, 15:13)
- Re: you don't have to! (TomBo, Sep 24, 2003, 15:37)
- Re: you don't have to! (Moth, Sep 24, 2003, 15:47)
- Sources (morfe, Sep 24, 2003, 15:51)
- Re: you don't have to! (FourWinds, Sep 24, 2003, 15:57)
- Re: you don't have to! (FourWinds, Sep 24, 2003, 16:04)
- yes (morfe, Sep 23, 2003, 13:06)
- Re: Radiating Power (Steve Gray, Sep 23, 2003, 13:21)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Earthstepper, Sep 23, 2003, 10:19)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (morfe, Sep 23, 2003, 13:02)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Jane, Sep 23, 2003, 14:00)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (FourWinds, Sep 23, 2003, 14:03)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Jane, Sep 23, 2003, 14:16)
- Ferrari's and Flesh (morfe, Sep 23, 2003, 14:16)
- 21 senses (morfe, Sep 23, 2003, 14:25)
- Re: Ferrari's and Flesh (Hob, Sep 23, 2003, 16:51)
- Re: Ferrari's and Flesh (FourWinds, Sep 23, 2003, 16:57)
- shit (morfe, Sep 23, 2003, 18:19)
- Re: shit (FourWinds, Sep 23, 2003, 21:06)
- Re: Ferrari's and Flesh (morfe, Sep 23, 2003, 17:33)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Rhiannon, Sep 23, 2003, 09:46)
- Loki (TomBo, Sep 23, 2003, 11:41)
- Trainspotting (baza, Sep 24, 2003, 18:41)
- AWESOME !! (Shestu, Sep 25, 2003, 17:43)
- Re: Tombo's weblogs... (Megalithic, Sep 09, 2006, 19:01)
|
|