The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian

Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Stonehenge Forum Start a topic | Search
Stonehenge
Archaeologist
143 messages
Select a forum:
Actually, I think that illustrates my point. Archaeological evidence is rarely conclusive, so it's always subject to opinion. Even RC dating is not so accurate that it removes all doubt. Apart from the inherent error in the method, there are often issue like "old wood" and "later disturbance" that could add or remove several hundred years from RC dates.

So, as you say it would be nice to have an archaeologist who is willing to consider our proposals as "plausible". He doesn't have to nail his colours to our mast, only to say that our interpretation of the evidence is reasonable.

What about this BBC guy who favoured wooden cribs? Can we contact him?


Reply | with quote
Steve Gray
Posted by Steve Gray
18th September 2003ce
10:59

In reply to:

Re: Ramps?? (nigelswift)

1 reply:

Re: Archaeologist (GordonP)

Messages in this topic: