I agree strongly with most of that, except perhaps we should leave the 2 day/one day decision till we know what we can do, as I suspect Gordon will be reluctant to wimp out.
Incidentally, don't worry about hills, Salisbury Plain is mostly mis-named and we'd be very unlucky if there wasn't some sloping terrain in the vicinity of where the stone is.
I'm not sure that the fact we're rowing uphill will be the strongest selling point anyway. Distance may be the thing that impresses the TV people. And, ideally, a few seconds of footage where it's all going perfectly, like the University Boat Race!
There's an idea! Maybe we should challenge the beeb!
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
1st September 2003ce
12:45 |
Stone Shifting 2 (nigelswift, Aug 26, 2003, 17:00)- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (Jane, Aug 26, 2003, 17:16)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (Steve Gray, Aug 26, 2003, 17:46)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (GordonP, Aug 26, 2003, 20:44)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (FourWinds, Aug 27, 2003, 11:24)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (nigelswift, Aug 29, 2003, 09:10)
- Steve's idea to fix a pivot log under the stone (nigelswift, Aug 30, 2003, 08:24)
- Which Method? (nigelswift, Aug 31, 2003, 07:09)
- Pi in the sky (baza, Aug 31, 2003, 17:44)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (jimit, Sep 01, 2003, 19:39)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: 3.1415926538 in the sky (Steve Gray)