Actually, yes, that's the point. We have to be focussed. Not individually, but as a team. That's why titles matter, they define areas of responsibilty and minimise duplication of effort. There's no reason why one person cannot have several roles, but it makes sense to divide the tasks according to ability and level of comittment. We also need to present the image of a well-organised and motivated team properly geared up to carry out the project, rather than a loose-knit bunch of amateurs who are liable to lose interest, or just "take the money and run". In other words, any potential backers needs to view us as a good risk. Defined roles help to achieve that.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Steve Gray
29th August 2003ce
11:44 |
Stone Shifting 2 (nigelswift, Aug 26, 2003, 17:00)- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (Jane, Aug 26, 2003, 17:16)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (Steve Gray, Aug 26, 2003, 17:46)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (GordonP, Aug 26, 2003, 20:44)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (FourWinds, Aug 27, 2003, 11:24)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (nigelswift, Aug 29, 2003, 09:10)
- Steve's idea to fix a pivot log under the stone (nigelswift, Aug 30, 2003, 08:24)
- Which Method? (nigelswift, Aug 31, 2003, 07:09)
- Pi in the sky (baza, Aug 31, 2003, 17:44)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (jimit, Sep 01, 2003, 19:39)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Don't groan .. (nigelswift)