You looked it up on here and saw how crap the instructions were but then travelled all that way anyway? Honestly, the fieldnotes and photos do make it very clear (I worry too clear). I'd be pissed off too if I'd come all that way and barely found it, and I'm sorry you wore yourself out - but don't blame the information on here for your disappointment because there's plenty, surely you have to admit that now you look at the photos (did you print them off and take them with you?)
People were visiting it before all these photos were posted on the internet you know.. and they didn't have 20 figure grid references. And you know TMA hasn't got a legal obligation to provide the public with reliable information??!
Sorry for being grumpy, but not all sites are as signposted as others and surely it's better that way? Most sites on tma have no instructions about getting to them at all.. isn't part of the fun in actually finding them yourself?
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Rhiannon
26th June 2008ce
07:49 |
Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Moth, Aug 04, 2003, 16:16)- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Kammer, Aug 04, 2003, 16:48)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Rhiannon, Aug 04, 2003, 16:50)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Rhiannon, Aug 04, 2003, 16:57)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (baza, Aug 04, 2003, 17:25)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (gm, Aug 04, 2003, 18:17)
- As another non-finder (juamei, Aug 04, 2003, 20:05)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Randall, Aug 04, 2003, 20:14)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Ike, Aug 06, 2003, 18:27)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (megadread, Jun 25, 2008, 23:25)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (FourWinds, Jun 26, 2008, 06:47)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (megadread)