The only problem with your post is that it means the entire world is a ritual landscape, the term ritual therefore becomes redundant.
I am happy that terms such as ritual and sacred can be so generally applied that almost anything can be seen as ritual, but Nigel's original question was not so general I think. He was talking about the possibly man made hill and asking if there was a deliberate attempt to construct a sacred landscape. I'm not sure there was. to me many of the structures that we think of as part of a ritual landscape come from times so far apart that it is difficult to imagine that they could have been designed together, particulalry when many of these feature may have become overgrown and no longer visible.
The term sacred, as we have argued, would suggest that it was held precious in some way, yet it is not difficult to find examples where earlier "sacred" mnuments have been destroyed by later works, sometimes within a few hundred years of their construction.
To take a bunch ancient monuments and say it all forms part of an ancient sacred landscape, whilst being correct from a personal point of view - today, does somewhat presume a larger scale of planning in ancient times than was necesarily the case.
You just know that when I do my Thornborough bit I'm going to blow a hole in this whole line of argument don't you :)
Reply | with quote | Posted by BrigantesNation 31st July 2003ce 16:55 |
Sacred Landscapes (nigelswift, Jul 30, 2003, 09:05)- Re: Sacred Landscapes (ocifant, Jul 30, 2003, 09:15)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (Kammer, Jul 30, 2003, 09:36)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (BrigantesNation, Jul 30, 2003, 10:37)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (baza, Jul 30, 2003, 19:20)
- Are you really ... (FourWinds, Jul 30, 2003, 19:43)
- Re: Sacred ? (Moon Cat, Jul 30, 2003, 20:57)
- All sacred. (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 20:58)
- Unbelievable (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:03)
- Nothing is sacred (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:22)
- Re: Nothing is sacred (baza, Jul 30, 2003, 21:45)
- Got it wrong? (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:50)
- Re: Got it wrong? (baza, Jul 30, 2003, 22:31)
- Re: Got it wrong? (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 23:23)
- Re: Got it wrong? (baza, Jul 31, 2003, 01:22)
- Is it? (BrigantesNation, Jul 31, 2003, 01:44)
- Re: Is it? (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 06:44)
- And ... (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 06:50)
- Well no.. (BrigantesNation, Jul 31, 2003, 08:03)
- Re: Well no.. (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 09:16)
- Well yes ... (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 12:26)
- Re: Well yes ... (BrigantesNation, Jul 31, 2003, 16:55)
- Don't stop ... (AtomicMutton, Jul 31, 2003, 08:03)
- Re: Got it wrong? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 17:10)
- Sacred is... (Kammer, Jul 30, 2003, 21:52)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moon Cat, Jul 30, 2003, 23:46)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 00:26)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 14:08)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 19:01)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 19:43)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 19:48)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 19:56)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 20:25)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 21:16)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:19)
- Shouldn't have said a word! (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 21:24)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Shestu, Jul 31, 2003, 21:26)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 21:30)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:34)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 21:49)
- Oi! (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:53)
- Re: Oi! (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 22:09)
- Aaaah! (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 22:23)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (Shestu, Jul 31, 2003, 21:38)
- Re: sacred in the eye? (pure joy, Aug 03, 2003, 11:25)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (Kammer, Jul 30, 2003, 21:44)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:11)
- Interesting cross-cultural article (morfe, Jul 30, 2003, 21:14)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (wychburyman, Jul 30, 2003, 21:34)
- words and power (Annexus Quam, Jul 30, 2003, 21:39)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (nigelswift, Jul 30, 2003, 21:59)
- Am I really me? (FourWinds, Jul 30, 2003, 23:35)
- Nature (Annexus Quam, Jul 31, 2003, 09:58)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (moss, Jul 31, 2003, 11:25)
- TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 11:25)
- Re: TimeGhost (BrigantesNation, Jul 31, 2003, 11:39)
- Re: TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 11:52)
- Re: TimeGhost (BrigantesNation, Jul 31, 2003, 12:12)
- Re: TimeGhost (baza, Jul 31, 2003, 12:26)
- Re: TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 12:39)
- Re: TimeGhost (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 12:46)
- Re: TimeGhost (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 16:09)
- Pantheism? (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 18:50)
- Re: Pantheism? (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 20:54)
- Only (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 20:58)
- Tombo... (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:32)
- Re: Pantheism? (Moth, Jul 31, 2003, 21:28)
- Re: TimeGhost (Jane, Jul 31, 2003, 12:31)
- Re: TimeGhost (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 12:53)
- Re: TimeGhost (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 12:56)
- Re: TimeGhost (Jane, Jul 31, 2003, 14:14)
- Spot on (morfe, Jul 31, 2003, 17:20)
- BTW... (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 21:59)
- Re: TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 20:59)
- Re: TimeGhost (TomBo, Jul 31, 2003, 21:39)
- Re: TimeGhost (FourWinds, Jul 31, 2003, 12:39)
- Re: Sacred Landscapes (nigelswift, Jul 31, 2003, 22:15)
- a cognitive theory of the sacred (TomBo, Jan 20, 2004, 01:03)
|
|