Ah ha! A bit of Blake! Just cos a pic shows a willy (or indeed a mighty pair of breasts) doesn't necessary mean its porn. Surprising, eh! I guess it depends on:
-the context (nude scultpure in a public piazza or photos in a glossy mag by a bedside)
-the subject (blonde nubile or genito-urinary clinic)
-the viewer (which way they swing, how horny they're feeling, etc)
I have to say that Blake doesn't get me 'hot'. Turner, however.... phwoar!
Reply | with quote | Posted by Jane 8th May 2003ce 08:53 |
Jane, your lovely paintings (Rhiannon, May 07, 2003, 13:54)- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Jane, May 07, 2003, 14:01)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Kammer, May 07, 2003, 14:04)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Rhiannon, May 07, 2003, 15:11)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Joanna, May 07, 2003, 16:54)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (fitzcoraldo, May 08, 2003, 00:36)
- Art or porn? (FourWinds, May 08, 2003, 07:48)
- Re: Art or porn? (Jane, May 08, 2003, 08:53)
- Re: Art or porn? (BlueGloves, May 08, 2003, 09:42)
- sex and death (fitzcoraldo, May 08, 2003, 09:50)
- Re: Art or porn or imagination? (jimit, May 09, 2003, 08:44)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (FourWinds, May 10, 2003, 14:01)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Kammer, May 10, 2003, 20:05)
|
|