ah, intelligent and amusing - such flattery, but your posts are similarly well composed (I've been reading with interest your articulate attacks on the National Trust - it's no wonder they don't reply properly, they know they haven't got a chance). Well, I'd be delighted to meet you too. Will you be around at Jane's exhibition on Sunday? If not, it's not that far from round here to round there so I'm sure the occasion will present itself.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Rhiannon
7th May 2003ce
16:52 |
Jane, your lovely paintings (Rhiannon, May 07, 2003, 13:54)- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Jane, May 07, 2003, 14:01)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Kammer, May 07, 2003, 14:04)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Rhiannon, May 07, 2003, 15:11)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Joanna, May 07, 2003, 16:54)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (fitzcoraldo, May 08, 2003, 00:36)
- Art or porn? (FourWinds, May 08, 2003, 07:48)
- Re: Art or porn? (Jane, May 08, 2003, 08:53)
- Re: Art or porn? (BlueGloves, May 08, 2003, 09:42)
- sex and death (fitzcoraldo, May 08, 2003, 09:50)
- Re: Art or porn or imagination? (jimit, May 09, 2003, 08:44)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (FourWinds, May 10, 2003, 14:01)
- Re: Jane, your lovely paintings (Kammer, May 10, 2003, 20:05)
|
|
Head To Head 
For Rhiannon From That Treaclechops Woman (treaclechops)