Was talking to my mother today, who happens to be a Christian - but thankfully an unbigoted, fair minded one - and she made the point that if PP had be granted for the cross, shouldn't there be a plaque attached to it saying who, where, why, and what it was there for . . . a very good point, I thought. Could this be a possible chink for the no PP aspect?
And she was jolly unimpressed with it all from both the religious and historical prespectives as previously discussed in this thread - finds the whole concept unacceptable. Cool mum. And I'm not being biased!! :o)
t'chops x
 Reply | with quote | Posted by treaclechops
5th May 2003ce
10:55 |
Cross erected on barrow...possible witnesses? (Cursuswalker, May 03, 2003, 10:36)- Re: Cross erected on barrow...possible witnesses? (Cursuswalker, May 03, 2003, 10:39)
- Re: Cross erected on barrow...possible w (Grendel, May 03, 2003, 11:47)
- Re: Cross erected on barrow...possible w (Grendel, May 03, 2003, 19:21)
- History and Paganisation (treaclechops, May 04, 2003, 00:07)
- Re: History and Paganisation (pure joy, May 04, 2003, 00:42)
- Yes, but ... (BlueGloves, May 04, 2003, 08:22)
- Re: Yes, but ... (nigelswift, May 04, 2003, 08:37)
- Eeeek! (jimit, May 04, 2003, 09:09)
- Re: Eeeek! (treaclechops, May 04, 2003, 10:12)
- Mother unimpressed (treaclechops, May 05, 2003, 10:55)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Eeeek! (treaclechops)