Megalithics wrote: Rockrich wrote: I'll make this one my last comment, because Ive drifted off topic (sorry folks, my fault).
If you apply a 10-15% tolerance to the guidelines on focal distance, camera angles etc you'll still get excellent results. We broke so many photogrammetric rules on NADRAP but proved the robustness of the technique.
Thanks for the info Rockrich, and apologies to all if we got a little OT and techie.
How can anyone mind, we haven't got a fkin clue what your on about. ; )
Reply | with quote | Posted by megadread 15th February 2011ce 02:00 |
What no Stonehenge? (Sanctuary, Feb 11, 2011, 15:18)- Re: What no Stonehenge? (megadread, Feb 11, 2011, 15:47)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (Lubin, Feb 11, 2011, 16:20)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (Gwass, Feb 12, 2011, 08:55)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (The Sea Cat, Feb 12, 2011, 11:16)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (Mustard, Feb 12, 2011, 11:17)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (scubi63, Feb 12, 2011, 12:24)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (Megalithics, Feb 12, 2011, 17:36)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (Shelby Mustang, Feb 12, 2011, 19:29)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (The Eternal, Feb 12, 2011, 23:14)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (faerygirl, Feb 13, 2011, 10:28)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (Moth, Feb 13, 2011, 11:22)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (moss, Feb 13, 2011, 11:43)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (Littlestone, Feb 13, 2011, 12:23)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (Howburn Digger, Feb 13, 2011, 13:09)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (thesweetcheat, Feb 13, 2011, 14:26)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (Blingo_von_Trumpenst, Feb 13, 2011, 14:45)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (sleeptowin, Feb 14, 2011, 10:03)
- Re: What no Stonehenge? (jimit, Feb 15, 2011, 09:42)
|
|