The question is are they going to bother with a Northern route, and just leave it as it is
I wondered about that. Are they just saying they want the Northern route to sound more positive than what they're really saying -
", we won't be going anything for a decade or two".
If so, then lets get the A344 shifted as an interim measure.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
25th July 2007ce
07:08 |
A303 TUNNEL AT STONEHENGE SCRAPPED BYPASS TO THE NORTH INSTEAD!!!!! (copius-freakus2, Jul 24, 2007, 20:14)- Re: A303 TUNNEL AT STONEHENGE SCRAPPED BYPASS TO THE NORTH INSTEAD!!!!! (moss, Jul 25, 2007, 06:59)
- Re: A303 TUNNEL AT STONEHENGE SCRAPPED BYPASS TO THE NORTH INSTEAD!!!!! (nigelswift, Jul 25, 2007, 07:08)
- Re: A303 TUNNEL AT STONEHENGE SCRAPPED BYPASS TO THE NORTH INSTEAD!!!!! (goffik, Jul 26, 2007, 11:26)
- Another megalithic aristocrat rocks! (nigelswift, Aug 05, 2007, 08:02)
- Re: A303 TUNNEL AT STONEHENGE SCRAPPED BYPASS TO THE NORTH INSTEAD!!!!! (lilydee05, Aug 14, 2007, 13:32)
- Maybe Stonehenge to be Rotherwassed after all? (nigelswift, Sep 07, 2007, 05:58)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: A303 TUNNEL AT STONEHENGE SCRAPPED BYPASS TO THE NORTH INSTEAD!!!!! (moss)