I live in Salisbury and on a recent visit to the museum I has struck by the differences in size of the “archers” leg bones. That’ assuming it is a real skeleton. One leg seemed far thinner than the other so I have my doubts he could have had good enough balance to be a good archer. Not seen any other comments on this issue but be interested if anyone has other ideas.
Makes me wonder if – as discussed elsewhere – Stonehenge area was believed to have healing properties.
