Ocifant may not have been very impressed with the long barrows at Hazleton, but did he realise they feature in ‘Raiders of the Lost Ark’? Surely that would have changed his mind. Well, perhaps not.
In the film Harrison Ford gives a lecture to his archaeology class about ‘Turkdean barrow near Hazleton’. He says “This site demonstrates one of the great dangers of archaeology.. not of life and limb although that does sometimes take place.. No, I’m talking about folklore. In this case a local tradition held that there was a golden coffin buried at the site... this accounts for the holes dug all over the barrow...”
I’ve no idea if this common folklore motif really is attached to this barrow (a golden coffin is supposed to be at Windmill Tump, near a (different) Hazleton Manor). Lots of barrows have the folklore that they contain a golden object (though it’s very rare that any actually do) so it’s not surprising the film makers should mention this theme – all three films are about myth and archaeology are they not?
Perhaps the film makers chose Hazleton because the north barrow there was very comprehensively excavated – I suppose it must be a well known example of a Cotswold-Severn style barrow amongst archaeologists. The films all have some loose! basis in ‘real’ legendary subjects. But I don’t think it was excavated until the 1980s! so Dr Jones in his 1930s university wouldn’t have heard of it.
Perhaps you could visit the Corinium Museum in Cirencester, where they have reconstructed the chambers, if you want to know what was found.
british-publishing.com/Pages/CirencesterOG/TheCoMuseum.htm
Personally I’m quite frightened that my current interest might be simply traced subconsciously to a childhood obsession with a film.