The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   General Discussion Forum Start a topic | Search
The Modern Antiquarian
Re: The Heritage Action Counter
207 messages
Select a forum:
goffik wrote:
Dimjim wrote:
[Hey goffik ? You are not being constructive. Constructive comments only please (like mine above) and no hate. Nigel can look after himself.]


I don't know where you get the "hate" thing from, Dimjim!

I was merely asking for evidence to prove the Heritage Action counter is incorrect - and still nobody seems able - or willing - to do so! Until that point, the counter is, effectively, unchallanged. You can't just say "that's wrong!" without providing a reason why...

What, may I ask, is unconstructive about that?

G x


Unconstructive = Bastard got me backed into a corner with no escape so rather than answer the question I'll whinge and bleat and change the subject as often as possible to divert attention from my wriggling and fidgeting.

Ah, good old Usenet...


 This topic is locked
slumpystones
Posted by slumpystones
2nd June 2007ce
21:08

In reply to:

Re: The Heritage Action Counter (goffik)

1 reply:

Re: The Heritage Action Counter (nigelswift)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page