sanshee wrote:
Cheers.
As for 'unionist parties' though... they do have a spectrum of ideas on immigration and how to deal with child refugees.
It's a very unfortunate term that's polluting Scottish politics right now.
We can do without it, polarising, unhelpful, dishonest.
Sturgeon says she'll take one in, magic, that's only 349 to house;)
Oh Yvette Cooper too, so that makes it 348.
Let's not hold our breath though:(
Forgive me if I'm wrong, spoke to Eilidh Whiteford a couple of weeks ago and I had thought the intention was that Scotland would take them all of the children. To save children is never unhelpful imo and I know that is your opinion as well. As for 'unionist parties' though... they do have a spectrum of ideas on immigration and how to deal with child refugees.
It's a very unfortunate term that's polluting Scottish politics right now.
We can do without it, polarising, unhelpful, dishonest.
Sturgeon says she'll take one in, magic, that's only 349 to house;)
Oh Yvette Cooper too, so that makes it 348.
Let's not hold our breath though:(
