Another Election

close
more_vert

Well, referendums don’t always have to be on big issues; the last three Swiss ones were on the federal decree of 30 September 2016, to allow easier naturalisation of third generation immigrants. One on 30 September 2016, to create a fund for national roads and urban infrastructure. One on the 17 June 2016, to overhaul the corporate tax code to attract and retain international firms. Maybe three or four a year for the UK would be too many but perhaps once a year; the issue to be decided by a 50,000 names petition to Parliament.

I mentioned social media above and this is where it could play an active part – ie in not only getting people thinking about issues but also in allowing them a say in the matter.

I don't think that as a nation we are informed enough. That's why government in this country has always been by consensus. In this country referendu have caused more division and unrest than anything else in my lifetime.

You would have to do a lot more to educate and explain to people the costs and benefits of the options.

I also think it should be made absolutely clear whether it is binding, it should based on no change being made without a super-majority result either way (say at least 66%) and the proponents should fully cost the options. So if you have a referendum on whether every household gets a pig, the funding for that is clearly shown in the voting options (option 1: pig but higher taxes to pay for it, option 2: pig but cut health spending to pay for it, option 3 no pig) .